Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Impersonal Procreating
Dumbing things down for control.
The influence of Muslim society comes from their customs where women have no freedom to choose what they want to wear. They hide all skin except for their eyes. In this case a strict dress code is to be followed and is for some reason or other never broken. In Muslim society, if the dress code is broken the women is essentially fair game. If a women is raped breaking dress code she would essentially be the one accused of the crime and stoned to death. Both these societies restrict not only rights such as freedom, but also basic rights such as a choice of clothes.
What see in this story is the fact that women are nothing more but absolute slaves in this society.
1984 similarities
The society is basically using sex as a weapon, as it is one of the easiest ways to mass suppress a people, and is used in our society still to oppress women. The author shows how sex is being used simply for the pleasure of man, and that bestowing upon him a child is the only thing handmaidens are good for, he shows how these women can only be used for one thing, anything else is irrelevant.
It's also interesting to point out that while Offred gets put in a very interesting position throughout the novel as well because of her contact with the Commander. It's almost a double edged sword because of her "affair" with him. She cannot become too close because if his wife were to find out she would be banished, but if she refuses the Commander he may also send her to the same place. Offred must balance the two.
"The Problem Wasn't Only With the Women..."
The quote reads "The problem wasn't only with the women he says. The main problem was with the men. There was nothing for them anymore...I'm not talking about sex he says. That was part of it, the sex was too easy...You know what they were complaining about the most? Inability to feel" Now that women were being controlled by men the ability to "feel" was back for men. What about women? Don't they have the right to "feel"? Do you think both partners are entitled to sexual pleasure or do you thinking their is a "pecking order" for sex? Do you think one gives way to another? Can both be satisfied?
Lack of Unifying Theme
The popular image of women in modern religion and popular culture is the caring mother figure. What this new society has done has split the burden of motherhood upon two women, instead of just one, and that is only if you do not count the other women who are designated cooks and nurses. One woman endures a pregnancy and the other brings up the child. What is sad is that one of these women receives more flack than the other. Offred the handmaid, whose role is to endure the pregnancy, lives like a prisoner compared to Serena, the Commanders Wife, and women who would bring up the child. By using this system, one group of women has power, while another is being oppressed. Such importance is placed on the ceremonies surrounding birth, that it makes you wonder how the people of this society treat the women at the middle of these ceremonies like trash. It is all very ironic and absurd., but then again when you look at oppression it always is. Somehow, the person with the most power always seems to be able to convince everyone else, just about anything, in this case it is that a woman's body is a tool of the government. After reading more and more of the novel, it is easier to see everyday cases of oppression and not simply look at them as something natural. Many people in the novel know that what is going on is wrong but they simply cannot do anything about it, and they are forced to live in an absurd world.
Monday, May 2, 2011
IT'S ALL ABOUT SEX
As I was reading the part of the sexual act between Offred and the Commander I was instantly perplexed and horrified. I doubt this is the three way men are dreaming about. Not only is it awkward, cold and distant but also I doubt there do neither the Handmaids nor the Wives feel any pleasure. Lets not forget the immense pressure to perform these men must feel. The fact that in the book sex is for recreational purposes only is an absurd idea. I guess this is the oldest notion about sex. It is the agenda for many religious institutions to “control” the masses (by masses I mean women), hence why the author probably brought it up in the book. Sexual expression is one of the important and essential acts individuals can undertake. And even though women have often been deprived of the pleasure sexual acts can produce the book takes it to a new level. I guess in the author’s intent is to draw connections with female genitalia cutting.
It is important to recognize that just like many of the themes presented in the book about power there is too the element of power in the sexual act. For starters the Commanders play a crucial role in this pecking order, they are the one’s to receive pleasure and prestige with the outcome of the sexual act; hence they are at the very top of the totem pole. The presence of Serena Joy in the act is detrimental to the power hierarchy. The Wives presence in the act says to the Handmaids, that even though they are having sex with their husbands it is going to be at their own terms even if that means they have to be in it as well. In a very minute way Offred has some power, it is her body that is this “vessel” of procreation, a body she has little control of. I can only imagine how the author came up with the ideas in her book, I can only understand that she is taking some things in real life o produce this book.
It’s Baby Making Time
Something I found interesting, located around chapter 19, was when Aunt Lydia was speaking of the ‘Jezebels.’ Jezebels were women who did not want to have children. Aunt Lydia refers to them as “scorners of God’s gifts” and shows the handmaids a graph of how the birthrate had fallen over the course of history, eventually falling below the “line of replacement.” She further explains that women who did not want to breed were lazy sluts. WOAH!
Ok, first of all, doesn’t one need to be having a ton of sex with everyone to be considered a slut? But she is saying those who DO NOT have sex are sluts, and LAZY sluts, for that matter. HMM. So, Aunt Lydia isn’t really making much sense here, but nice try? I’m sensing a double-bind, the whole screwed-if-you-do, screwed-if-you-don’t situation.
Reading this nonsense reminded me of what I believe was chapter eight that we read in Jessica Valenti’s book, Full Frontal Feminism, entitled ‘Real Women Have Babies.’ Valenti speaks of how women’s reproduction rights are used to keep women in their places. She further explains that women who decide they do not want to have babies are looked down upon and are seen as unnatural because women are suppose to want to have babies, that it is a natural inclination. This is the exact idea Aunt Lydia is forcefully slam-dunking into the handmaid’s brains. They are forced to be raped in hopes of becoming preggers. This is clearly what Jesus wants for his creation. The messed up system of hierarchy is not only using the women’s bodies as a tool to oppress, but religion and God to justify the oppression, saying this is what God wants--for them to suffer. We can see how Offred is silently and perhaps unbeknownst to herself, fighting back. By her experiencing her own intense sexual desires for Nick (the guard) she is gaining a sense of her own sexuality and desires without experiencing pain or suffering and giving the middle finger to Gilead and all its untruths while doing so. Hooray!