In the historical notes of the book, the person speaking describes the particictuions as a "horrifying and effective way of ridding yourself of subversive elements but that it would also act as a steam valve for the female elements in Gilead." I think as the reader we are supposed to see this and question it rather than believe it. By looking back and reading about the particicutions we can see that clearly more was going on than just some women letting off steam. The men who were being killed were being presented as rapists to the crowds, rape being the highest crime there, when in reality these men were more often political enemies of the state. Women knew this fact, as demonstrated by Offglen and often did not want to participate in killing a man. We can see that there is much more than just releasing anger when it came to the participations by looking at Offglen's case in the particicution.
It mentions in the book that the person they were being made to kill was a man from the MAYDAY organization. So these women did not want to kill him, but do so in fear of what will happen if they do not. Offglen landed the first sharp blows to his head to kill him in order to stop him from suffering any longer. She felt extremely bad for the man secretly, but could not show her emotions to let on any suspicion, so really many of these killings weren't just anger releases to the women. I think a better way to analyze the killings is to look at the incentives of a government who maintains ceremonies like these.
The government is not looking out for the women at all as we can clearly see in the oppression they face everyday. So by saying that the particicutions were in anyway intended to help women by giving them a chance to blow off some steam is just ridiculous. I think what the government is really looking for is some act of faith, or submission. The act itself reduces the women to savages, and the idea is that they willingly do it. This idea demonstrates the power of the government and loyalty of its people. That is all the government is looking for in this process, or so I believe.
Monday, May 9, 2011
Particicution Interpretations
Blog #10 The End.
Twisted Words and Irony
It's interesting how the execution was called a "salvaging" because the word means "saving" which is not exactly what was going on here. could it be a saving to the society? what could the term saving have to do with "salvaging"? What were the women of Gilead being "saved" from? Another twisted word I came across was particicution. The word particicution was a twist of the words participation and execution which is similar to salvaging. This was carried out by a group. All the executions in Gilead were done in groups by the communities. This could have been done to show everyone what would happen if they decided to break the laws of Gilead. This Gileadean totalitarianism was both clever and gruesome. I believe the main function of these events was to provide an outlet for all the rage and hatred the Handmaid's built up towards the oppressive Gileadean men. In the novel during the particicution, the women of Gilead take out their anger towards a rapist and unify in the "participating execution". This allowed the women to channel their anger and may have been to prevent an upheaval in the handmaid community. Ironically this was done at Harvard symbolizing the freedom to pursue knowledge. However, as for where the salvaging was, it symbolizes the denial of access to knowledge. The novel shows many ironic and hidden messages if we look close enough to find them.
I am feminist, hear me roar!
This is me virtually sticking up my middle finger to these binaries. I will choose how I want to act and live my life, screw everything else. I will resist the status quo if I wish, and will not care if you insist on calling me a lesbian for doing so.
Reading through chapter 13 of WVFV, I had a good laugh reading the cartoon entitled ‘Unrequited Love no5- Passing a Building Site Fantasy.’ Hilariously enough and also sadly enough, I do not believe this scene will ever come to be true. Construction working men staring at an attractive female walking by saying things like, “I bet she’s intelligent” and “Wouldn’t mind a game of scrabble with her,” is a huge stretch. All I could think about when reading this cartoon, aside from the fact of how hilariously ironic it was, is when the commander invited Offred to his office late at night in The Handmaid’s Tale. I assumed the commander, like many of you safely assumed as well, was going to either rape or seduce Offred. Yet, he asked her to play a mere game of SCRABBLE! HA! That got me good. Men say women are so quick to judge and see them as pigs, but they, they’re the ones who should be showing us otherwise, right? Maybe if men were to say comments that were said in the cartoon, women wouldn’t feel like we needed to keep up with our “rape schedule,’ even though statistics show women are most often raped by people they know. Anyway, that’s what came to mind when I read the cartoon.
More importantly, it was disheartening reading in Hogeland’s article “Fear of Feminism- Why Young Women get the Willies” of how so many young women fear feminism, just as I once used to. I admit, I am still sometimes afraid of saying it out loud in front of certain people, but I know I have to bite my tongue and deal with it if I want to help raise awareness and witness change.
Hogeland made a great point about feminism in relation to politics. She states, “Feminism politicizes gender consciousness [and] inserts it into a systematic analysis of histories and structures of domination and privilege.” (723). Women do not want to hear of how underprivileged and oppressed they are, and men do not want to let go of the power they hold over women. So, feminism is scary to many. Feminism raises issues that make you think, issues that contain no right or wrong answers. But, that’s the beauty of feminism and the study of gender, there ISN’T a right answer. You are free to be, and that is all. As humans, all we know for certain about ourselves is we exist. In the famous words of Descartes, “I think, therefore I am.” He is absolutely correct.
So let’s not hesitate to say it ladies and gents. “I am FEMINIST, hear me roar!”
Profeminism- Men have a place in feminism
I, used to be, my control...
A quote that really caught my eye was spoken from Offred. She states “I used to think of my body as an instrument, of pleasure, or a means of transportation, or an implement for the accomplishment of my will . . . Now the flesh arranges itself differently. I’m a cloud, congealed around a central object, the shape of a pear, which is hard and more real than I am and glows red within its translucent wrapping… (page 73). Offred is responding to her body in this quote from the reading. It seems as she’s saying her body is only important because of the main ‘object’, her womb, which bears children to make the men happy. But before her body was “an instrument,” it was hers. She seemingly has internalized Gilead’s attitude toward women, which treats them as objects. Gilead’s attitude towards women brainwashes these women to believe they are useless as an individual, they’re object and only important for children. It seems that Offred is mesmerizing over her past and having a daughter of her own and how she tried to escape with her. Her daughter was too young to understand that they needed to be silent when shots rang but unfortunately Offred had to witness her own daughter being taken away from her. Offred describes her selfless self as “a cloud, congealed around a central object, which is hard and more real than I am.” She’s just a resource that is needed for these men. Offred had the control over her body, and now that she’s just an object she no longer has that control.
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Women of Gilead
The women of
The Handmaid’s Tale showed many aspects of today’s world in a different way. Readers were able to look at today’s world and think critically about how people are impacted by our cultural norms. Women specifically in the novel and in our society are treated differently than the other half of society, men. This book outrageously depicts the horrors of the loss of autonomy for women but it also helps one think critically about our world.