The Bloody Autostereogram!

It's a visibly noted notion, that psychologist believe males are typically more brutally violent than women. True, in a sense, a males imagination may soar and range through vast fields of vaginas, a cloudy dream of breast, and of course the bloody axel of murder. But, why is it that male violence is socially accepted to a slight degree? I honestly firmly stand by my notion, that violence in any child, is depicted by the living conditions one grows up in. Take for instance my brother, we grew up in a household with a savage of a father, and a very submissive mother (who in my opinion should of taken a women's studies course). My younger brother grew up programmed with inscriptive gospel truth, that it was alright for a man to (for a lack of a better word) beat the living feculence out of their wife.

Point to ponder?? I too grew up with that, but luckily for me, I was old enough to comprehend that men, should not lay a finger on a women, if of course it's not during displays of affection. I can guarantee that if I were to hand some images to my brother like the ones that Carol Gilligan mentioned in "Images of Relationships," he would fabricate a perverse scene where either a man killed a woman or a man or a goat or a cow or chewbacca (lets stop there). All in all I do believe with Gilligan's idea, to a certain extent. Boys will be "violent" boys, but lets be realistic here, I am almost 100% certain, that given the situation and setting my brothers and I grew up living, a girl would have just as much of a sadistic mind-set than that of my brothers.